tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6555947.post112163815461934852..comments2024-03-14T01:32:43.610-06:00Comments on The Geomblog: The Good-Turing EstimatorSuresh Venkatasubramanianhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/15898357513326041822noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6555947.post-1149860296267642932006-06-09T07:38:00.000-06:002006-06-09T07:38:00.000-06:00Could you please explain what 'glossing over' or '...Could you please explain what 'glossing over' or 'smoothing' means.<BR/>Thanx <BR/><BR/><A></A><A></A>Posted by<A><B> </B></A><A HREF="http://geomblog.blogspot.com/2005/07/good-turing-estimator.html" REL="nofollow" TITLE="razjivina at rambler dot ru">Ekaterina</A>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6555947.post-1122439601463263742005-07-26T22:46:00.000-06:002005-07-26T22:46:00.000-06:00Hmm, I suppose that should that bePr(X) = [(r+1)/N...Hmm, I suppose that should that be<BR/><BR/>Pr(X) = [(r+1)/N] * [E(N(r+1)) / E(N(r))]<BR/><BR/>?<BR/><BR/>The paper seems to have N(r+1) as the numerator (on page 6). <BR/><BR/><A></A><A></A>Posted by<A><B> </B></A>MaverickAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6555947.post-1121712896236731982005-07-18T12:54:00.000-06:002005-07-18T12:54:00.000-06:00latex+beamerhttp://latex-beamer.sourceforge.net/&#...latex+beamer<BR/><BR/><A HREF="http://latex-beamer.sourceforge.net/" REL="nofollow">http://latex-beamer.sourceforge.net/</A> <BR/><BR/> <BR/><BR/><A></A><A></A>Posted by<A><B> </B></A>SureshAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6555947.post-1121707604291806602005-07-18T11:26:00.000-06:002005-07-18T11:26:00.000-06:00Cool slides! What tool did you use to make them?&#...Cool slides! What tool did you use to make them? <BR/><BR/><A></A><A></A>Posted by<A><B> </B></A>JulianAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com