In the short-haul, papers are very important if you want to stimulate someone tomorrow. If you want to get recognition long-haul, it seems to me writing books is more contribution because most of us need orientation. In this day of practically infinite knowledge, we need orientation to find our way. [....]In unrelated news, March of the Penguins is playing in Philadelphia right now.
The present growth of knowledge will choke itself off until we get different tools. I believe that books which try to digest, coordinate, get rid of the duplication, get rid of the less fruitful methods and present the underlying ideas clearly of what we know now, will be the things the future generations will value. Public talks are necessary; private talks are necessary; written papers are necessary. But I am inclined to believe that, in the long-haul, books which leave out what’s not essential are more important than books which tell you everything because you don’t want to know everything. I don’t want to know that much about penguins is the usual reply. You just want to know the essence.
Ruminations on computational geometry, algorithms, theoretical computer science and life
Tuesday, July 26, 2005
I don't want to know that much about penguins...
[Lowerbounds, Upperbounds] reproduces a famous speech titled 'You and your research' by Richard Hamming. The entire speech makes for excellent reading, but I thought this excerpt, from discussions at the end, was very insightful. Replace 'book' by 'blog', and there you go...
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Do you relly believe that books and blogs are
ReplyDeletesimilar? I believe that blogs can popularize
topics and results but I don't believe that they
can replace books.
Posted by Anonymous
What I meant was that if you replace the word 'books' by the word 'blogs', you get a good working definition of what blogs can do for you. I don't think that blogs will supplant books; they can however provide a supporting role in order to
ReplyDelete"digest, coordinate, get rid of the duplication, get rid of the less fruitful methods and present the underlying ideas clearly of what we know now "
Posted by Suresh