passing peer review is better understood as saying a paper is not obviously wrong, not obviously redundant and not obviously boring, rather than as saying it's correct, innovative and important.Of course, the contrapositive of this is that an obviously wrong, redundant and boring paper has some nonzero chance of being rejected ;)
Ruminations on computational geometry, algorithms, theoretical computer science and life
Friday, November 30, 2007
The true meaning of peer review
from Cosma Shalizi:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Are you sure deMorgan wouldn't disagree?
ReplyDeletehe he :). you got me there.
ReplyDelete